This essay is the English translation of the foreword to the Italian edition of Film, Art, and the Third Culture, published in 2022 as Cinema, evoluzione, neuroscienze: un’estetica naturalizzata del film (Rome: Dino Audino). It approaches Murray Smith’s study as a key entry point into the ongoing dialogue between film theory and the cognitive sciences, and as a catalyst for rethinking the epistemological foundations of film studies in light of neuroscience. The analysis situates Smith’s notion of “cooperative naturalism” within a broader critical framework that questions how the humanities can engage with scientific models without relinquishing their interpretive autonomy. By comparing Smith’s work to other approaches—such as bioculturalism and Neurofilmology—the essay considers Film, Art, and the Third Culture as both a theoretical experiment and a methodological provocation: a testing ground for new interdisciplinary configurations that challenge the comfort zone of traditional film scholarship while redefining what it means to study cinematic experience today.
At a key point in Film, Art, and the Third Culture, Murray Smith confronts his readers with a choice—though in truth it is an accomplished fact:
Film scholars and aestheticians can stay in their comfort zone and pretend it is not happening, or they can look outward with an open mind as well as a sceptical eye, assessing just what neuroscience might or might not have to offer to our understanding of the arts (Smith 2017: 85).
This challenge invites film scholars to step beyond their disciplinary boundaries and take the risk of exploring a still unfamiliar territory: the relationship between film studies and cognitive neuroscience. It is not a reckless gamble, however, but a necessary phase in an ongoing epistemological shift. For some years now, research into the perceptual, cognitive, and emotional dimensions of film experience has opened dialogue with the natural sciences, gradually moving toward a…
˜
Click here to download full article