In Greece, the problem of responsibility for choices was originally discussed by poets and legislators. Philosophical analysis developed in relation to these reflections, and Plato wanted to undermine the authority of poets with a new approach, inspired by Socrates. Aristotle tackled the question starting from Plato’s position. His approach was not limited to the question of the responsibility of those who perform evil actions, but extends to a general evaluation of the entire sphere of human actions. The problem of responsibility in Aristotle is discussed on the basis of a precise ontology of events, and falls within the field of moral psychology and physics. Alexander of Aphrodisias even came to support the thesis that in two identical situations we always have the possibility of choosing one action or its opposite. This is based on the very complex Aristotelian idea of causation as a one-way dependence relationship, which does not always imply necessity.
The philosophical discussion on guilt and responsibility in ancient Greece develops against a particular cultural background, which must be taken into account for the historical understanding of the terms of the debate and to avoid a too hasty identification of ancient positions with contemporary problems. In the beginning, the problem of responsibility for choices was not a philosophical issue, but was discussed by poets, legislators and tragedians; philosophical analysis developed in relation to these reflections, sometimes in continuity with…
˜
Click here to download full article