<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Custom - Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.argumenta.org/articles/keyword/custom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.argumenta.org</link>
	<description>Journal of Analytic Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 09:24:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Wittgenstein on Habit and Custom: A Conceptual Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/wittgenstein-on-habit-and-custom-a-conceptual-analysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massimo Dell'Utri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=2287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The last decade has seen a significant increase in interest and research on the philosophy of habit. Indeed, as highlighted by Barandiaran and Di Paolo (2014), many philosophers from Aristotle onwards have dealt more or less explicitly with the notion of habit. However, interest in habitual behaviour in the 20th century suffered from the dominance [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/wittgenstein-on-habit-and-custom-a-conceptual-analysis/">Wittgenstein on Habit and Custom: A Conceptual Analysis</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
