<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deontic Powers. - Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.argumenta.org/articles/keyword/deontic-powers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.argumenta.org</link>
	<description>Journal of Analytic Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 14:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Constitutive Rules [Special Issue]</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/constitutive-rules/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcello Montibeller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 13:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There is an intuitive distinction between two kinds of rules: those that regulate antecedently existing behaviors and those that constitute new forms of behavior and thus regulate the very behavior that they constitute. It is natural to think of these types of rules as regulative and constitutive. I think that terminology which I first introduced [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/constitutive-rules/">Constitutive Rules [Special Issue]</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
