<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Essence - Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.argumenta.org/articles/keyword/essence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.argumenta.org</link>
	<description>Journal of Analytic Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 18:15:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Essence and Knowledge [Special Issue]</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/essence-and-knowledge-special-issue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massimo Dell'Utri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 22:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=2362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this paper I will defend the thesis that the essence of something just is a set of cognitively significant properties with a certain modal profile. More precisely, an essential property of x is a necessary property of x which constitutes a significant source of knowledge about x. And the essence of x is a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/essence-and-knowledge-special-issue/">Essence and Knowledge [Special Issue]</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pragmatics of Metaphysics Explanation: An Epistemology of Grounding [Special Issue]</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/the-pragmatics-of-metaphysics-explanation-an-epistemology-of-grounding-special-issue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massimo Dell'Utri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 22:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=2358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a voluminous and growing literature on grounding. However, the literature on the epistemology of grounding is relatively sparse. There are numerous contributions to the literature addressing questions about the nature of grounding. Is grounding irreflexive? Asymmetric? Transitive? Is grounding well-founded? Is grounding properly expressed as a relation or as an operator? Does grounding [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/the-pragmatics-of-metaphysics-explanation-an-epistemology-of-grounding-special-issue/">The Pragmatics of Metaphysics Explanation: An Epistemology of Grounding [Special Issue]</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laws of Metaphysics for Essentialists [Special Issue]</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/laws-of-metaphysics-for-essentialists-special-issue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massimo Dell'Utri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 21:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=2350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper discusses two interesting, related questions at the interface of metaphysics and philosophy of science. They are both linked to the idea that there is an important analogy—or more than just an analogy—between scientific explanations that involve causal laws or laws of nature (I use these notions synonymously), and metaphysical explanations that involve laws [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/laws-of-metaphysics-for-essentialists-special-issue/">Laws of Metaphysics for Essentialists [Special Issue]</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relativized Essentialism about Modalities [Special Issue]</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/relativized-essentialism-about-modalities-special-issue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massimo Dell'Utri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=1711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The last few decades have witnessed a revival of essentialism in metaphysics—with essence understood in the Aristotelian, absolute sense. One main way in which essence has been put to work is as a source of modality (see e.g. Fine 1994; Lowe 2008; Hale 2013). On what I call absolutist essentialism about modality (AE), the metaphysical [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/relativized-essentialism-about-modalities-special-issue/">Relativized Essentialism about Modalities [Special Issue]</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Essence, Necessity, and Non-Generative Metaphysical Explanation [Special Issue]</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/essence-necessity-and-non-generative-metaphysical-explanation-special-issue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massimo Dell'Utri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=1709</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Finean essentialists, essence is the metaphysical source or ground or explanation of metaphysical necessity. Fineans hold that metaphysically necessary facts are metaphysically explained by facts about essence. Recently, there has been a wave of criticism against Finean essentialism. According to Casullo (2020), Leech (2018, 2021), Mackie (2020), Noonan (2018) and Romero (2019) essences [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/essence-necessity-and-non-generative-metaphysical-explanation-special-issue/">Essence, Necessity, and Non-Generative Metaphysical Explanation [Special Issue]</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logical Essence [Special Issue]</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/logical-essence-special-issue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massimo Dell'Utri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=1707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An increasingly popular view at the intersection of logic and metaphysics is that logical necessities have their source in the essences of logical entities. On such a view, metaphysical necessity has its source in the essences or natures of things, and logical necessity is a restriction of metaphysical necessity. But logical and metaphysical necessity are, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/logical-essence-special-issue/">Logical Essence [Special Issue]</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
