<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hubert Schwyzer - Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.argumenta.org/articles/keyword/hubert-schwyzer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.argumenta.org</link>
	<description>Journal of Analytic Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 14:31:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title> Meta-Meta-institutional Concepts? [Special Issue]</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/meta-meta-institutional-concepts-special-issue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcello Montibeller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 13:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The paper is a critical analysis of Hubert Schwyzer’s idea of meta-institutional concepts. The chief example of a meta-institutional concept is that of winning in a game. Games are different and have different rules. Nonetheless, they share the concept of victory that is present in most rulebooks. As Roversi (2014) says, we use the same [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/meta-meta-institutional-concepts-special-issue/"> Meta-Meta-institutional Concepts? [Special Issue]</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
