<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ideal Referee - Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.argumenta.org/articles/keyword/ideal-referee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.argumenta.org</link>
	<description>Journal of Analytic Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 14:33:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>What Does It Mean That Constitutive Rules Are in Force? [Special Issue]</title>
		<link>https://www.argumenta.org/article/mean-constitutive-rules-force-special-issue/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcello Montibeller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.argumenta.org/?post_type=article&#038;p=945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>John R. Searle (1969: 33-41) explicitly made the famous distinction between ‘regulative’ and ‘constitutive’ rules (it should be noted that Searle was neither the first nor the only philosopher to use a distinction of such type, as von Wright (1963) or Rawls (1955) also stressed the difference between these rules, yet the Searlean account seems [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.argumenta.org/article/mean-constitutive-rules-force-special-issue/">What Does It Mean That Constitutive Rules Are in Force? [Special Issue]</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.argumenta.org">Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
