Argumenta – Journal of Analytic Philosophy

 

Toxic Conspiracy Theories as Epistemically Illuminating Falsehoods

Issue: • Author/s: David Buzaglo
Topics: Epistemology, Theoretical philosophy

This paper explores the epistemic implications of endorsing a specific category of conspiracy theories, which I term “toxic conspiracy theories” (following Basham, 2018). I contend that these theories exert a profound and distinctive impact on our belief system, not only shaping perspectives on the specific events they are purported to explain, but also influencing our broader understanding of sociopolitical reality. I delineate a surprising result of this doxastically encompassing nature of toxic conspiracy theories: if some toxic conspiracy theory is true, then a belief in a false one can be…